What to Read in The Hindu Editorial( Topic and Syllabus wise)

Editorial 1: ​​Ceremonial heads

Context

Governors serving as Chancellors often hinder rather than help the functioning of universities.

Introduction

The Supreme Court of India has repeatedly censured Governors for overstepping their constitutional authority, particularly in State-run universities. Despite judicial directives, Governors continue to exercise de-facto vetoes and influence legislation, often creating political and ideological tensions. These clashes highlight the colonial legacy of the Governor’s office and raise questions about the need for university autonomy in modern India.

Supreme Court vs Governor Interventions

• In April, the Supreme Court of India strongly censured Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi, but it had little effect on Governors’ ongoing confrontations with State governments.
• The Court ruled against the Governor exercising a de-facto vetoon 10 Bills concerning universities passed by the State legislature.
• It set specific timelinesfor Governors to respond to Bills.
• The Court declared any Presidential intervention based on a Governor’s recommendation as infructuous.
• Example: Last week, Governor Ravi referred the Kalaignar University Bill to the Presidentinstead of granting assent.
• In Kerala, Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar caused controversy by directing universities to observe a ‘Partition horrors day’ on August 14, 2025, sparking criticism over potential ideological motives.
• Arlekar’s predecessor, Arif Mohammed Khan, also clashed with the government, delaying or effectively vetoing Bills, particularly those related to universities.
• Despite the Court’s rulings, the President has challenged the judicial line through references.

Universities as a Political Battleground

• State-owned universities are key areas of conflictbetween Governors and State governments.
• Governors have direct authority over universities, giving them leverage in political disputes.
• Historically, the Governor’s office was a colonial mechanismto control provinces ruled by Indian parties.
• British Governors acted as ceremonial heads (Chancellors)of universities to ensure prestige, autonomy, and colonial influence.
• Post-independence leaders retained Governors as central appointeesto guard against separatist tendencies.
• Many State legislations maintained Governors as Chancellorsto preserve this colonial aura.
• Even in Tamil Nadu, a Bill aimed at reducing Governors’ role in Vice-Chancellor appointments did not remove their Chancellor position.
• In Kerala and Tamil Nadu, Governors often serve as central proxies with political and ideological agendas.

Towards University Autonomy

• Draft UGC regulations propose removing State government influencein Vice-Chancellor selection, giving all power to the Chancellor.
• The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasizes university autonomy, expecting institutions to:
  • Raise funds independently
  • Be accountable for expenditures
  • Have leaders serve as academic heads, administrators, fundraisers, and managers
• The trend suggests it may be practical to appoint professional leadersrather than Governors as ceremonial and executive heads of universities.

Conclusion

The recurring conflicts between Governors and State governments underscore the tension between constitutional authority and political agendas. Moving towards university autonomy, as envisioned in the NEP 2020 and draft UGC regulations, could ensure institutions are managed by professionals rather than political appointees. Strengthening accountability, independence, and academic leadership is essential for India’s higher education system to thrive.

 

Editorial 2: Only united action can stop the hyacinth’s invasion

Context

A national policy with region-specific strategies is essential to halt the severe damage caused by this invasive aquatic plant.

Introduction

Every monsoon, a silent menace spreads across India’s rivers, backwaters, and lakes, transforming them into vast green deserts. This threat is the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), an aquatic plant with delicate lilac flowers that belie its destructive power. Its impact is particularly severe in Kerala, a state renowned for its intricate network of backwaters and the iconic Vembanad Lake. Introduced in India during colonial rule as an ornamental plant, the water hyacinth’s prodigious growth has since overwhelmed the very ecosystems and communities it was meant to decorate. Today, it is estimated that over 2,00,000 hectares of inland waters nationwide have been smothered by this weed, disrupting the lives and livelihoods of countless Indians.

Impact of Water Hyacinth on Livelihoods, Ecology, and Climate

• Farmers:Paddy cultivators in Kerala’s Kuttanad region face blocked irrigation channels, hindered water flow, and choked fields, increasing costs and labor for agriculture.
• Fishermen:Dense mats disrupt fish nurseries, reduce native fish populations, block access to water bodies, and damage nets and boats, making traditional fishing nearly impossible.
• Aquatic Biodiversity:Floating hyacinth mats block sunlight and oxygen, suffocating aquatic flora and fauna and disrupting entire food webs.
• Ecotourism Threat:Wetlands like Vembanad Lake, a Ramsar-recognised site, face risks to tourism, transport, and livelihoods due to hyacinth proliferation.
• Climate Impact:As the plant accumulates and decays, it releases methane, a greenhouse gas over 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide, exacerbating climate change.

Experiments that must be scaled up

• Innovation:Across India, communities and innovators have found ways to turn water hyacinth into a resourcerather than a menace.
• Odisha:Women’s self-help groups weave water hyacinth into handicrafts, baskets, and furniture, showcasing grassroots creativity.
• Assam & West Bengal:The plant is being used for paper production and biogas generation, demonstrating diverse applications.
• Limitation:These experiments, though promising, are currently isolated in scope and scale, requiring expansion.
• Policy Support:Scaling up demands financial incentives, robust value chains, and coordinated policy measures.
• Accountability:Responsibility is diffused across agriculture, fisheries, environment, and irrigation departments, leading to piecemeal, short-term actions.
• Centralised Mechanism:A single-point accountability system with national and region-specific strategies is essential for effective management.
• Scientific Removal:Coordinated removal drives should use scientific methods, mechanisation, and localised technology, particularly where labour availability is low (e.g., Kerala).
• Private Sector & Research:Innovators should be incentivised, partnerships with the private sector encouraged, and research into viable products like crafts, biofuels, compost, and textiles promoted.
• Collaborative Initiatives:Jain University, Kochi, under the Future Kerala Mission, convened experts, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine water hyacinth as a sustainable livelihood resource.
• Awareness & Knowledge Integration:The University launched awareness campaigns and discussion papers, combining academic research, policy insights, and community experience to transition from sporadic experiments to systematic, sustainable solutions.

Conclusion

India’s rivers and lakes are invaluable resources that cannot be allowed to suffer due to neglect or the unchecked spread of a single invasive species. The water hyacinth threat demands immediate attention, responsibility, and collective effort. Every community, government agency, entrepreneur, and citizen must understand that this issue extends beyond ecology—it affects rural livelihoods, food security, climate resilience, and the green economy. It is time to eliminate not only the water hyacinth but also the inertia that enables it to thrive. Decisive action cannot be delayed.