16 October 2025 The Hindu Editorial
What to Read in The Hindu Editorial( Topic and Syllabus wise)
Editorial 1: Navigating the global economic transformation
Context
India and the Global South can join hands to build a fair new economic system for all countries.
Introduction
The world’s economic order is changing fast. The U.S. and China are caught in a major power struggle, each building its own economic network to protect its interests. This global shift is altering trade routes, currency systems, and strategic plans. Yet, within this change lies a rare chance to create a fairer and more balanced world order.
Analysing New Economic Paradigms
- State–Capital Nexus
- Populist leaders are joining hands with big businesses.
- They give special treatment to a few rich companies that help them hold power.
- Public wealth is traded for private gain, hurting ordinary citizens.
- This weakens the social contract between people and the state.
System Type | Role of Government | Main Beneficiaries | Impact |
Laissez-faire capitalism | Limited control | Public and small firms | Fair competition |
Populist–autocratic capitalism | Heavy, selective control | Crony capitalists | Rising inequality and corruption |
- Resurgence of Power Politics
- Crony capitalists influence national leaders to revive old-style power games.
- The U.S. is reworking its global strategy to protect its dominance.
- It presses Taiwanto shift chip production, secures Panama routes, and controls rare earth supply in Africa and Central Asia.
- It mixes digital currencyand foreign policy to expand reach.
- Such moves create rival “zones of influence” and spark new conflicts.
U.S. Strategy | Target Region | Purpose |
Chip relocation | Taiwan–U.S. | Secure tech supply |
Route control | Panama | Protect trade lanes |
Resource link | Africa, Central Asia | Access rare minerals |
Arctic push | Greenland, Canada | Gain future energy and ecology control |
- Digital Colonialism
- Big Tech and cloud giants reshape economies and influence politics.
- They control data, media, and financial systems.
- This digital power supports populist leaders who restrict digital rights.
- Over 100 central banksare testing digital currencies, which could weaken national independence.
Trend | Example | Key Concern |
AI and data laws | AI Action Plan, Cloud Act | Threat to privacy |
Financial systems | SWIFT, CBDCs | Weakens sovereignty |
Digital monopolies | Big Tech dominance | Limits fair competition |
Result:
While digital systems make transactions faster, they also erode economic freedom and transparency, deepening global inequalities.
Opportunity in Crisis
- Lessons from Global Disruptions
- Economic shocks bring new chances for countries like India and China, which led the world economy for most of history.
- The old model of neoliberal globalisationfocused on profit, cheap labour, and exploiting nature.
- This system created huge debt, reduced funds for welfare, and handed public assets to private elites.
- The result was extreme wealth gaps between the Global Northand the rest of the world.
Old Global Model | Features | Effects |
Neoliberal Globalisation | Capital accumulation, cheap labour, trickle-down growth | Massive inequality, debt crises, weak welfare systems |
- Deepening Inequality
- The World Bank’s 2022 reportsays nearly half of the world lives below the $6.85/day poverty line.
- About 735 million peoplestill suffer hunger.
- These harsh conditions create frustration and social divides.
- Populist leaders often use this anger to push undemocratic agendas.
Indicator | Data (2022) | Key Concern |
Global poverty | 47% of population | Economic exclusion |
Hunger | 735 million people | Rising instability |
Social impact | Decline in trust | Populist politics |
- Building a Fairer Economic Order
- India and the Global South must not acceptan unjust system.
- They can collaborateto design a New Economic Deal that helps all nations.
- India should seek reform of global financial institutionsto ensure fair representation.
- It must also push for debt-relief frameworksto help developing nations regain freedom from unfair conditions.
- Through BRICSand South-South cooperation, India can lead new alliances and promote fair trade.
- To keep relations strong, India should build bipartisan tieswith key partners like the U.S., Bangladesh, and Nepal — not just government-to-government links.
Strategy | Objective | Example |
Reform financial systems | Fair representation | IMF and World Bank reform |
Debt-relief framework | End structural debt traps | Global South coordination |
South-South partnerships | Balanced trade growth | BRICS cooperation |
Bipartisan diplomacy | Long-term stability | Wider ties beyond ruling parties |
Need for a Recalibration
- Rethinking India’s Growth Path
- India must make a clear course correction to reach its true potential.
- The private sector helps growth and creates jobs, but it focuses mainly on profit.
- The state must take the leadin key areas like energy, defence, space, health, and education.
- A strong public role ensures security, equal access, and national self-reliance.
Sector | State’s Role | Purpose |
Energy & Infrastructure | Build and regulate | Ensure stable growth |
Health & Education | Fund and expand | Support every citizen |
Defence & Space | Lead and innovate | Strengthen national security |
Digital Finance & Data | Govern and protect | Safeguard sovereignty |
- Preventing Corporate Dominance
- India needs strong anti-monopoly lawsto stop a few firms from gaining control.
- Setting up a sovereign wealth fund, like Norway’s, can help manage national savings wisely.
- This fund can invest profits from public assets back into people’s welfare and national goals.
- Redirecting public sector units (PSUs)to act like China’s state-owned enterprises can boost both revenues and global influence.
Reform | Global Example | Benefit |
Anti-monopoly laws | EU, U.S. | Fair competition |
Sovereign wealth fund | Norway | Invests for public good |
PSU redeployment | China | Enhances strategic power |
- Investing in Knowledge and Digital Sovereignty
- India must invest deeply in science, research, and education.
- Giving academic freedomwill make innovation faster and more meaningful.
- The digital-financial systemshould follow constitutional values like equality, justice, and transparency.
- Aligning technology with national goals will protect both citizens’ rights and India’s independence.
Focus Area | Goal | Impact |
Scientific research | Drive innovation | Global competitiveness |
Education autonomy | Encourage creativity | Skilled youth |
Digital finance | Match constitutional aims | Secure, inclusive growth |
Conclusion
India stands at a defining crossroads in a rapidly changing world economy. To turn global disruption into opportunity, it must blend state-led vision with inclusive growth. By reforming financial systems, strengthening social foundations, and championing South–South cooperation, India and the Global South can together build a fair, resilient, and balanced global order rooted in justice and shared prosperity.
Editorial 2: Evolution, revolution
Context
The Economics Nobel celebrates the power of freedom and the spirit of innovation.
Introduction
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences honours Philippe Aghion, Peter Howitt, and Joel Mokyr for explaining how innovation drives growth through creative destruction. Their work links history, culture, and mathematics to show how progress replaces the old with the new. It also reminds us that innovation depends on both market freedom and state direction.
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences
Understanding the Award
- The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economicswent to Philippe Aghion, Peter Howitt, and Joel Mokyr.
- Together, they explored why human progresshas grown so fast in the last 200 years.
- Joel Mokyrstudied the historical and cultural roots of innovation.
- Aghionand Howitt developed a mathematical model called “creative destruction.”
Economist | Contribution | Focus |
Joel Mokyr | Historical and cultural roots of innovation | Long-term progress |
Aghion & Howitt | Formalised “creative destruction” model | Mathematical theory of growth |
The Idea of Creative Destruction
- The idea comes from Joseph Schumpeter, who saw capitalism as an evolving system.
- He said innovation replaces old technologies and industries— a process that’s both creative and destructive.
- Schumpeter believed this worked best when markets are free, competition is open, and the state only enables, not directs, innovation.
- But history shows that states like the USSR and Chinaalso drove innovation through planning and direction.
Model | Key Belief | Example | Limitation |
Schumpeter’s Capitalism | Innovation through free markets | 20th-century Western economies | Ignores state’s role |
State-led Innovation | Government directs growth | Soviet Union, China | Limits individual freedom |
The Endogenous Growth Theory
- In the 1990s, Aghion and Howittrefined Schumpeter’s idea during the rise of neoliberalism.
- Their endogenous growth theorysaid that long-term growth comes from innovation, education, and researchwithin the economy.
- It focused on private competitionand market incentives, not central planning.
Theory | Core Driver | Outcome |
Endogenous Growth | Innovation, research, education | Self-sustained growth |
Exogenous Growth | External factors (like aid, population) | Short-term growth only |
Challenges to the Model Today
- The Nobel came at a time when these ideas face new challenges.
- Under Donald Trump, the U.S. turned protectionist, politicised science and trade, and reduced global openness.
- The model fits neoliberal capitalismbut fails to explain state-led innovations in China’s economy.
- It also overlooks how geopolitics, inequality, and weak institutionsaffect innovation.
Issue | Example | Effect |
Trade weaponisation | U.S.–China trade war | Disrupts global innovation chains |
Inequality | Wealth gaps in Global North | Limits creative participation |
Institutional control | State dominance in China | Challenges free-market models |
The Nobel’s Deeper Message
- The award is also a warning to liberal democracies.
- The ideals of open markets, scientific freedom, and institutional independenceare weakening.
- To keep innovation alive, nations must protect freedomswithin a state-enabled, inclusive capitalism.
Principle | Needed Action | Purpose |
Openness | Encourage free ideas and trade | Boost creativity |
Freedom of research | Protect science from politics | Sustain innovation |
Balanced capitalism | Combine state guidance with liberty | Ensure fair growth |
Conclusion
The Nobel recognition celebrates the power of innovation, yet warns that its foundations are weakening. As trade wars, protectionism, and state control reshape economies, nations must find balance. True progress demands free inquiry, fair competition, and inclusive growth. Only by blending state guidance with institutional freedom can the world sustain the creative energy that fuels human advancement.