23 January 2026 Indian Express Editorial
What to Read in Indian Express Editorial ( Topic and Syllabus wise)
Editorial 1 : Cracks Beneath Urban “Development”
Context
Recent urban tragedies in cities like Delhi, Indore and Noida reveal deep-rooted governance failures despite visible infrastructure growth. These incidents highlight systemic apathy, weak accountability and neglect of routine administration, raising serious concerns about the quality of urban governance in India.
Core Issues Highlighted
Failure of Responsive Governance
Repeated incidents show delayed emergency response and poor grievance redressal.
Citizens’ complaints (contaminated water, unsafe infrastructure) often go unaddressed.
This violates the principle of citizen-centric administration.
Accountability Deficit
Responsibility is often shifted to lower-level actors instead of fixing institutional lapses.
This reflects weak internal accountability mechanisms in public administration.
The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) emphasised that accountability must be systemic, not symbolic.
Neglect of Routine Administration
Excessive focus on new infrastructure (“concrete achievements”) sidelines:
Maintenance of existing assets
Safety audits
Regular inspections
CAG reports on urban local bodies have repeatedly flagged poor maintenance and asset management.
Infrastructure without Maintenance
Capital expenditure dominates urban planning, while operation and maintenance (O&M) remain underfunded.
According to NITI Aayog, inadequate maintenance reduces infrastructure life and increases disaster vulnerability.
Erosion of Civil Service Ethos
The pursuit of visibility and recognition undermines anonymity and neutrality.
As per ARC, civil servants must prioritise service delivery over publicity.
Structural Causes
Fragmented urban governance and weak municipal capacity
Staff shortages and poor skill upgradation at the local level
Absence of performance metrics linked to service quality
Weak enforcement of safety and environmental norms
Constitutional and Institutional Aspects
Article 243W: Mandates Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) to ensure public safety and basic services
Right to Life (Article 21): Includes the right to safe living conditions
74th Constitutional Amendment: Yet to be fully realised in spirit due to inadequate devolution
Way Forward
Shift from Asset Creation to Asset Management
Mandatory safety and maintenance audits of urban infrastructure
Dedicated urban maintenance funds
Strengthen Accountability Mechanisms
Clear fixing of institutional responsibility
Time-bound action on citizen complaints
Professionalise Urban Administration
Capacity building of municipal staff
Use of technology for inspections and emergency response
Citizen-Centric Governance
Effective grievance redressal systems
Community participation in urban monitoring
Ethical Reorientation of Civil Services
Reinforce values of public service, empathy and responsibility
Align performance evaluation with service outcomes, not visibility
Conclusion
Urban development cannot be judged by infrastructure alone. True progress lies in safe, responsive and accountable governance. Unless routine administration, maintenance and ethical responsibility regain centrality, urban modernity will remain a fragile illusion, vulnerable to recurring tragedies.
Editorial 2 : Art, Witnessing and Accountability in Ongoing Conflicts
Context
The Voice of Hind Rajab (2025), a film based on the real-life killing of a six-year-old Palestinian girl and the ambulance medics who attempted to rescue her during the Gaza conflict. The article questions whether artistic “witnessing” is sufficient when large-scale violence and humanitarian crises continue with impunity.
Core Issue
The central concern is the gap between global awareness and accountability. Despite extensive media coverage, documentation, and artistic representation of civilian suffering, violations of international humanitarian law continue without meaningful consequences.
Key Arguments
Limits of Art as Witness
Art can document suffering and preserve memory, but it cannot replace political action and accountability.
In situations where violence is already globally visible, awareness alone is insufficient.
Impunity and Failure of International Mechanisms
The killing of civilians and medical personnel violates the Geneva Conventions, which mandate protection for non-combatants and humanitarian workers.
Continued violations highlight the weakness of enforcement mechanisms at the global level.
Contradiction in Global Response
The film’s global acclaim exists alongside continued military, financial, and diplomatic support to the actors accused of violations.
This reflects selective morality and double standards in international relations.
Risk of Moral Complacency
Engagement with art should not create a false sense of ethical satisfaction.
Symbolic condemnation without concrete action risks normalising injustice.
Other aspects
International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
As per the Fourth Geneva Convention, attacks on civilians and medical personnel are prohibited.
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has repeatedly flagged attacks on healthcare infrastructure in conflict zones.
International Accountability:
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has emphasised state obligations to prevent acts that may amount to genocide.
However, enforcement depends on political will, exposing limitations of the current global order.
Ethics and Justice:
It raises the ethical issue of passive complicity, where inaction by powerful actors indirectly sustains injustice.
True ethical responsibility requires moving from empathy to action.
Way Forward
Artistic expression must be accompanied by policy pressure, diplomatic accountability, and civil society action.
States, international institutions, and global citizens must translate documentation into legal, political, and humanitarian outcomes.
Upholding human dignity requires not only witnessing suffering but actively challenging structures that perpetuate violence.
Conclusion
Art remains a powerful tool for justice, but it cannot substitute responsibility. In prolonged conflicts, ethical engagement demands action alongside awareness. Without accountability, witnessing risks becoming remembrance without justice.
![]()
